Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

Invelos Forums->Posts by T!M Page: 1 2 3 ...15  Previous   Next
Message Details
'10': Max Showalter

'The Anderson Tapes': Max Showalter

'Bewitched: Season 2': Max Showalter

'Perry Mason: Season 2': Casey Adams

'Sixteen Candles': Max Showalter
Posted:
Topic Replies: 2, Topic Views: 54
If you just ignore the logo and enter it as 'Mission: Impossible', as it should be, then there's no problem. This was discussed before, for 'MIB Men in Black' and its sequels, and Ken Cole actually came into that debate and ruled that we were to use 'Men in Black' and ignore the "MIB", "MIIB" and "MIB³" logos. Since we've got that ruling, and both examples are very much alike, I would treat (and have done so) these 'Mission: Impossible' titles the same way.

Quoting Ken Cole (click!):
Quote:
In this particular case, the titles will be Men in Black, Men in Black II and Men in Black III.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 1, Topic Views: 74
Yup, it's really Maurkice Woods.

'Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman: The Complete Third Season': Maurkice Woods

'Wag the Dog': Maurkice Woods
Posted:
Topic Replies: 2, Topic Views: 37
The CLT shows entries for Brandon W. Jones in not just one, but three seasons of 'Pretty Little Liars ': the fourth, fifth and sixth seasons. Those additional two seasons should be added to the list as unconfirmed.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 8, Topic Views: 2319
Quoting GSyren:
Quote:
We should - if at all possible - document the data, not the description.

I agree with that stance.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 47, Topic Views: 382
Quoting GSyren:
Quote:
Not to mention the fact that the cover quite often doesn't say anything at all about the audio.

Indeed.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 47, Topic Views: 382
Quoting GSyren:
Quote:
I guess it means "Check that you follow the rules of capitalization".

Yeah, that's how I take it.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 8, Topic Views: 171
Quoting GSyren:
Quote:
"How did Ken envision that we would tell 1-channel and 2-channel mono apart?"

I daresay he didn't envision that at all. I think he really didn't expect anything beyond entering what the cover says. It's just unfortunate that cover information is so often completely inaccurate.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 47, Topic Views: 382
'The Big Bang Theory: The Complete Tenth Season': Brandon Jones
Posted:
Topic Replies: 8, Topic Views: 2319
Quoting GSyren:
Quote:
If the title on the cover should actually happen to be "Tout Va Bien", should that capitalization be kept or not?

No.

Quote:
So we should use the correct capitalization, even if the cover title doesn't? E.g. ”Tout va bien"?

Yes.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 8, Topic Views: 171
'The Devil Wears Prada': (uncredited)

That seems to make Guy Fortt the common name.

Edit: with 2 vs. 2 titles, the larger number of profiles acts as the tiebreaker, which makes Guy Fortt the common name for now.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 9, Topic Views: 214
I'm in the "no" camp as well.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 10, Topic Views: 266
Quoting TheMadMartian:
Quote:
Since they are not TV episodes, the TV Series rules do not apply and the standard rules should be used.

So first you want to treat them as episodes, and at the same time, you don't want to treat them as episodes? Let's just be consistent. And then you say you want to apply "the standard rules" - so what do you think those are, then? Wait, I'll show you:

- The standard rules for "any release that includes more than one film" are here, and they demand individual profiles for each film. But you just said that you didn't want that, and as CubbyUps pointed out, the contribution rules actually speak out against that.

- The standard rules for "Anthologies of Episodes that do not form a complete series or season", the description that seems to fit scooterberwyn's example best, are here, and they state that disc-level profiles are not required, and that "In either case, the cast and crew are to be entered into the parent profile using appropriate episode dividers."

So if you want to use the standard rules, these are the two standard rules to choose from. The third standard rule you're apparently thinking of, really doesn't exist. If you think it does, please point out where it is.

No, either we consider these individual films, or we consider this a collection of episodes, and for either scenario, there is indeed a standard rule on how to deal with that. There's is no third standard rule for a collection of shorts, no special exception. It's either one or the other.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 9, Topic Views: 272
Seventeen more confirmations:

'30 Rock: Season 1': Siobhan Fallon Hogan
'Baby Mama': Siobhan Fallon Hogan
'Big Trouble': Siobhan Fallon Hogan
'The Bounty Hunter': Siobhan Fallon Hogan
'Charlotte's Web': Siobhan Fallon Hogan
'A Cool, Dry Place': Siobhan Fallon
'Daddy Day Care': Siobhan Fallon Hogan
'Fools Rush In': Siobhan Fallon
'Going in Style': Siobhan Fallon Hogan
'Greedy': Siobhan Fallon
'New in Town': Siobhan Fallon Hogan
'Only You': Siobhan Fallon
'The Paper': Siobhan Fallon
'Seinfeld' S2-episode 'The Deal': Siobhan Fallon
'Seinfeld' S3-episode 'The Truth': Siobhan Fallon
'Seinfeld' S5-episode 'The Opposite': Siobhan Fallon
'What's the Worst That Could Happen?': Siobhan Fallon
Posted:
Topic Replies: 21, Topic Views: 345
Yes, I'd also list them as episodes. And since we qualify them as episodes, the disc-level profiles are optional, and therefore the cast/crew for *all* shorts/episodes also should be listed in the parent profile.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 9, Topic Views: 272
'The Protectors: Complete Series One': Jesse Lasky
Posted:
Topic Replies: 6, Topic Views: 278
Quoting CubbyUps:
Quote:
So, which Rating System do we use in this case?

Personally, in this particular case, I'd probably leave that field empty on the parent profile, and only use it on the child profiles.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 3, Topic Views: 235
'Catch and Release': John B. Destry

'Dudley Do-Right': John Destrey (which is different to what ateo357 reports)
Posted:
Topic Replies: 19, Topic Views: 792
Quoting AiAustria:
Quote:
This depends on the locality.

It does not, no. Those three categories of contributions (new ones, updates to existing profiles, and those subject to "second-level reviewing") are each done in the order they're submitted - it's absolutely not affected by region and/or locality. All contributions, no matter where they come from or for which locality they're intended, are just put in a queue from the moment they reach the Invelos-server, and any time there's any processing going on, those contributions are processed in that same order (within those categories), oldest ones first.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 14, Topic Views: 762
Your user profile shows that you have 5 accepted profile contributions under your belt - so you have succeeded in the past. The approval process seems to be running normally: contributions have been approved and released every single day this past week. New contributions can't be voted on, they're only evaluated by Invelos, which means they're usually approved quicker than "regular" contributions.

Nine days doesn't fit with neither new contributions (as others have been approved/released in the last nine days), nor with regular contributions (as, again, others have been approved/released in the last nine days). As such, it would seem that your contribution falls into a *third* category, which are contributions that get pushed to "second-level-reviewing". This, for instance, happens automatically when a contribution includes a birth year that isn't yet accepted into the database, and it can happen when a contribution is deemed "controversial" in any way. Second-level-reviewing isn't done on a daily basis or even at regular intervals - it can take a couple of days or a week, but two weeks is no exception, and there have been times that it took a full month. So if your contributions are really pending for nine days, my guess is that they're in that second-level-reviewing queue, and that may take a bit longer. But if that's the case, they *will* be evaluated eventually.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 14, Topic Views: 762
'Columbo: S12E01': Frank Di Elsi

'One Good Cop': Frank DiElsi

'Speechless': Frank DiElsi
Posted:
Topic Replies: 4, Topic Views: 251
Certainly not option #1, as that would label his entire credit as (uncredited), effectively removing the credit from the CLT. That could theoretically (not in this case) even impact common-name finding, and that just wouldn't be accurate, as he *is* credited. So option #1 is out.

So to me, it's either your second or third option. In cases where the leads are given no role names on-screen (not unusual for TV shows), your third option seems to be the obvious choice. In other cases, I could support your second option.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 5, Topic Views: 311
No valid credit in 'D.A.R.Y.L.'
Posted:
Topic Replies: 31, Topic Views: 951
Quoting GreyHulk:
Quote:
Nope. No no votes on any of them. In fact quite a few positive votes.
Have re-submitted with further notes. But there really isn't much more to say. I watched the film and identified the people. How am I supposed to prove that?!

I've seen your work, and it's consistently of a high standard. If you tell me you've "watched the film and identified the people", then that's more than enough for me. From what you're describing, I can only assume the screeners have simply made a mistake.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 13, Topic Views: 915
I can't find Michael Bond anywhere in this thread, although the 1926 birth year is already accepted into the database and present in quite a few profiles. So let's properly document it:

British writer Michael Bond (1926-2017), 'Paddington'
- https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1286491/
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Bond
- http://biography.jrank.org/pages/1131/Bond-Thomas-Michael-1926.html

American actor Michael Bond (???), 'Torch Song Trilogy', 'Remington Steele', 'Airwolf', 'V: The Original Miniseries'
- https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0093999/
- http://www.aveleyman.com/ActorCredit.aspx?ActorID=41977
Posted:
Topic Replies: 4433, Topic Views: 194632
Invelos Forums->Posts by T!M Page: 1 2 3 ...15  Previous   Next