submitted back and front scans with slip cover. initial copies came with slip cover as noted by huskersports. also back scan in database has "pull" sticker at the top. thanks
Evaluate this contribution
*Updated Notes*
submitted back and front scans with slip cover. initial copies came with slip cover as noted by huskersports. also back scan in database has "pull" sticker at the top. thanks
Regardless of the no voters the image is not of bad quailty unless you consider the slipcover bad quality. I realize the "insert" is better but when i tried to submit a Hills Have Eyes "insert" cover and not use the "bad quailty" of the slip cover which had a "blood" bubble the no votes came and said "must use slip cover". i believe this is a case where yes the insert might look better but it isnt the slip cover. there are quite a few slip cover's that dont look as good as the insert
*Updated Notes*
submitted back and front scans with slip cover. initial copies came with slip cover as noted by huskersports. also back scan in database has "pull" sticker at the top. thanks
Regardless of the no voters the image is not of bad quailty unless you consider the slipcover bad quality. I realize the "insert" is better but when i tried to submit a Hills Have Eyes "insert" cover and not use the "bad quailty" of the slip cover which had a "blood" bubble the no votes came and said "must use slip cover". i believe this is a case where yes the insert might look better but it isnt the slip cover. there are quite a few slip cover's that dont look as good as the insert
back scan in database has "pull" sticker at top. sloppy work and not the slip cover!!
*Updated Notes*
submitted back and front scans with slip cover. initial copies came with slip cover as noted by huskersports. also back scan in database has "pull" sticker at the top. thanks
Regardless of the no voters the image is not of bad quailty unless you consider the slipcover bad quality. I realize the "insert" is better but when i tried to submit a Hills Have Eyes "insert" cover and not use the "bad quailty" of the slip cover which had a "blood" bubble the no votes came and said "must use slip cover". i believe this is a case where yes the insert might look better but it isnt the slip cover. there are quite a few slip cover's that dont look as good as the insert.
back scan in database has "pull" sticker at top. sloppy work and not the slip cover!!
*Updated Notes*
submitted back and front scans with slip cover. initial copies came with slip cover as noted by huskersports. also back scan in database has "pull" sticker at the top. thanks
Regardless of the no voters the image is not of bad quailty unless you consider the slipcover bad quality. I realize the "insert" is better but when i tried to submit a Hills Have Eyes "insert" cover and not use the "bad quailty" of the slip cover which had a "blood" bubble the no votes came and said "must use slip cover". i believe this is a case where yes the insert might look better but it isnt the slip cover. there are quite a few slip cover's that dont look as good as the insert.
back scan in database has "pull" sticker at top. sloppy work and not the slip cover!! CHECK OUT THE INCEPTION COVER IN DATABASE. I FIND THIS VERY HARD TO READ!!
Profile Contribution Approved Dec 10 2010 9:06AM
Image Contribution Approved Dec 10 2010 9:06AM
Profile Contribution Approved Dec 14 2010 8:57AM