Quoting surfeur51:

Quote:
Quoting Dr Pavlov:

Quote:
As I said surfeur, even if I bought your sillyl argument, ...

Well, can you explain me why :

must be "Star Wars II : L'attaque des clones"
and
should not be "007- Opération Tonnerre"

I would say, and this is my opinion and interpretation of the rules, for Star Wars, the original title contains Episode I, II, III, ... So, the artwork reflects the episode numbering. On the other hand, for the James Bond series, 007 hasn't been part of any title, so I assume here it is just the use of a Logo, which happens to be behind the title. Personally, if it was accepted, I would lock my local database.

I use the sort title to show them all together and in chronological order.

Well, now I have an extra reason not to upgrade my 007 DVD's to Blu-Ray.

If the rules would be followed strictly for the Benelux releases,

Thunderball would become 007: Thunderball: Opération Tonnere   

Quoting Dr Pavlov:

Quote:

At least you understand the proper formnatting, which is more than surfeur did, and refused to acknowledge and correct.

Sorry Skip, but the proper formatting may be discussed here. In fact we have in the title a special character that cannot be typed (the gun). For this, rules must be interpreted, as Ken stated :

Quoting Ken Cole:

Quote:
Wherever practical, I think a filter would be able to cut out some of the confusion.  For instance, we already have "•" becomes "-". 

I'd love to be able to formulate a simple policy about when to use a character for symbol and when to leave it out.  The key is whether a character is intended, and whether a suitable character exists. To me, I would say that the dots shown in FRIENDS are for display only and not intended as a character, whereas the "•" in WALL•E is clearly intended as a character, which by filter becomes WALL-E.

The botom line is that our title rule is not intended to make the title look exactly like the title on the cover (we have cover scans for that), but to portray the title shown in standard characters.

As I understand Ken's statement, we should use a standard character to portrait the gun, and that is why I propose 007-, which seems better than 007 :

But I agree that this may be discussed.

Thank you, Gerri. I knew that. Happy now, surfeur. You have the word from on high.

Skip

Oh, good god.

Skip

For easy access to my James Bond films and others like the star trek films, etc.
I have created a manual parent profiles for the title like James Bond, Star Trek, etc. with no collection number, SRP, etc. with the list of the film in their production date in the overview section. Then when I type James Bond in the sort title locates this list. Then if I clear the title all the those child film in that list follows. I also apply James Bond plus its number in the sort title. So, you people argue all you want
No matter what title you people come with I don't give RA.