Author |
Message |
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 4,667 |
| Posted: | | | | Skip,
The issue here isn't whether the rule is vague or not, so I won't get into an argument about that.
The issue is whether you have a right to disagree. | | | My freeware tools for DVD Profiler users. Gunnar |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: Gunnar:
I still maintain that Rule is not vague. Two words DO NOT are very clear, therre was spin and rationalization to an extreme degree to ignore the prime directive of the Rule., Do NOT.
If you try hard enough you make believe any Rule is vague, I see it every day in the news and every day here.
Skip "DO NOT'?!?!?! What are you talking about? This thread is about quotes in the title...where do you get the words 'do not' from? Oh, and I agree, the rule is not vague. What is and isn't part of the title is, however, open to interpretation. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,372 |
| Posted: | | | | The rule must be vague. Nothing else explains why when Terry submitted the addition of quotes his submission was rejected yet when Telecine submitted the removal of the quotes his submission was also rejected. One way has to be correct, the other wrong IF it is 100% clear in the rules. For whatever reason Invelos has said yes, the quotes should be there but a few days earlier thay also said no, the quotes should not be there. Even they appear confused as both positions cannot be correct. I can only hope this rule change happens soon. Not sure why it couldn't For the record (and I believe I posted it yesterday) I too agree that it is their program. Whether I like something or not doesn't have anything to do with it. I will follow the rules as they are written. That doesn't mean I will always agree with what Ken and or Gerri say. Nobody agrees with everything someone else says 100% of the time unless they are simply agreeing to agree and throwing out their own point of view. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 13,202 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting lyonsden5: Quote: Nobody agrees with everything someone else says 100% of the time unless they are simply agreeing to agree and throwing out their own point of view. Or a husband. | | | No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever. There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom. Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand. The Centauri learned this lesson once. We will teach it to them again. Though it take a thousand years, we will be free. - Citizen G'Kar |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,372 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote: Quoting lyonsden5:
Quote: Nobody agrees with everything someone else says 100% of the time unless they are simply agreeing to agree and throwing out their own point of view.
Or a husband. yes dear... |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
Registered: May 9, 2007 | Posts: 1,536 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting northbloke: Quote: Thanks for the clarification Gerri, it'll be interesting to see how the rule is rewritten to make sure we can lose these kind of quote marks but keep the ones that are meant to be part of the title!
I'm so glad I'm not part of the rules committee... A very simple and universally understandable formula would be: Don't put quotes around the title. That still leave the option of The 'X'-Files (supposing something like that exists, I didn't check). | | | Hans |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 5,493 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting skipnet50: Quote: 4) And never...never talk about Fight Club.
Skip The Rules of Fight Club 1st RULE: You do not talk about FIGHT CLUB. 2nd RULE: You DO NOT talk about FIGHT CLUB. 3rd RULE: If someone says "stop" or goes limp, taps out the fight is over. 4th RULE: Only two guys to a fight. 5th RULE: One fight at a time. 6th RULE: No shirts, no shoes. 7th RULE: Fights will go on as long as they have to. 8th RULE: If this is your first night at FIGHT CLUB, you HAVE to fight. | | | In the 60's, People took Acid to make the world Weird. Now the World is weird and People take Prozac to make it Normal.
Terry |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 810 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Unicus69: Quote: Quoting skipnet50:
Quote: Gunnar:
I still maintain that Rule is not vague. Two words DO NOT are very clear, therre was spin and rationalization to an extreme degree to ignore the prime directive of the Rule., Do NOT.
If you try hard enough you make believe any Rule is vague, I see it every day in the news and every day here.
Skip
"DO NOT'?!?!?! What are you talking about? This thread is about quotes in the title...where do you get the words 'do not' from?
Oh, and I agree, the rule is not vague. What is and isn't part of the title is, however, open to interpretation. Skip forgot which rule he was fighting about in this thread. pdf | | | Paul Francis San Juan Capistrano, CA, USA |
|