| Registered: February 18, 2009 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 46 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting scotthm: Quote:
Quoting Kvack:
Quote:
The rules certainly say to follow the Common Name decisions, but they don't actually articulate if legitimate exceptions should occur.
That in itself is your answer. Exceptions don't follow the rules.
--------------- Perhaps I wasn’t clear. I was thinking that the rules should be updated (and, in my opinion, corrected). |
|
| Registered: March 20, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 2,875 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Kvack: Quote:
Perhaps I wasn’t clear. I was thinking that the rules should be updated (and, in my opinion, corrected). I don't think you'll find any disagreement with that, but I'd advise you to not hold your breath while waiting. In fact, I can't recall any rules updates that didn't accompany a program update, if you really want your hopes dashed. --------------- |
|
| Registered: May 24, 2007 | | Posts: 145 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Kvack: Quote:
Perhaps I wasn’t clear. I was thinking that the rules should be updated (and, in my opinion, corrected). I don't disagree, but Ken has the sole call on any rules changes and he hasn't weighed in on any rules matter in years. Hopefully if he never plans to return he'll someday appoint someone else to make the rules calls, but there hasn't been any sign of even that. |
|