| Registered: March 13, 2007 |  Posts: 26 |
| | Posted: | | | | New Profile, all data from disc and cover Evaluate this contribution Profile Contribution Approved Sep 4 2013 6:25PM Image Contribution Approved Sep 4 2013 6:25PM |
|
| Registered: May 16, 2010 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 516 |
| | Posted: | | | | Checked Running Time. BDInfo: 01:26:00 + 01:34:03 = 03:00:03 or 180 minutes as in database, no change. Corrected Media Companies from film start credits and how it is always written. Removed Features from this Box. They are now in the child profiles I opened today separately. Removed Video Formats as the two included films (child profiles) have not the same ratio. Added the two opened child profiles to Box Set. Removed Disc Info from the Box, they are in the 2 child profiles now. Evaluate this contribution Profile Contribution Approved Oct 7 2013 5:43PM | | | *
3D TV Panasonic TX-P65VT30J + Blu-ray Player Panasonic DMP-BDT500
My Filmcollection online: www.filmkino.ch
* |
|
| Registered: November 9, 2007 |  Posts: 3 |
| | Posted: | | | | add SRP: http://www.amapsys.de/dvd-info-B00D9I4QIC.htm remove Subtitles & Audio Tracks from Box Set corrected Overview from Backcover add new Coverscans Evaluate this contribution Profile Contribution Approved Nov 4 2013 4:01PM Image Contribution Approved Nov 4 2013 4:01PM |
|
  | T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 8,667 |
| | Posted: | | | | Corrected overview to match the back cover exactly - last sentence: "vertrauen ist gut" to "Vertrauen ist gut". Evaluate this contribution Profile Contribution Approved Nov 11 2013 3:38PM |
|
| T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 8,667 |
| | Posted: | | | | Movie box set profiles have no "Original Title". This largely empty profile does not track any actual film data: no cast or crew, no studios, and pretty much none of the other fields either. All that data is - and has to be, per the rules - in the child profiles, one for each film. That's great, those children actually do track movies, so indeed, those child profiles do have original titles. But as this box set profile doesn't actually profile any movies, it doesn't have an original title either. Evaluate this contribution Profile Contribution Approved Nov 18 2013 11:10AM |
|
| Registered: May 9, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 400 |
| | Posted: | | | | completed edition to match cover Evaluate this contribution *Updated Notes* completed edition to match cover to the lovely dear No-Voter: look at the cover -> that's the complete edition from the cover which includes the media type and this is not against the rules Profile Contribution Declined Jun 26 2014 6:39PM | | | | Si on n'a pas ce qu'on aime, on doit aimer, ce qu'on a ! | | | | Last edited: by MickySpoon |
|
| T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 8,667 |
| |
| T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 8,667 |
| | Posted: | | | | As a box set parent profile that only acts as a container for it's two child profiles, this profile is, per the rules, largely empty: no cast/crew, no features, no disc ID's, no audio tracks, no subtitles - all are left out because this profile for an empty box doesn't actually *have* any of those properties. By the same reasoning, there's no point in retaining video information either. Evaluate this contribution *Updated Notes* As a box set parent profile that only acts as a container for it's two child profiles, this profile is, per the rules, largely empty: no cast/crew, no features, no disc ID's, no audio tracks, no subtitles - all are left out because this profile for an empty box doesn't actually *have* any of those properties. By the same reasoning, there's no point in retaining video information either. Attention screeners: You've just approved this exact same contribution into at least 75 other profiles, where this change was consistently welcomed by all. I'm convinced that I'm doing the right thing here, I feel I've explained it quite well in my original notes, and that's why I'm leaving this contribution standing - despite the misguided no-votes. Profile Contribution Approved 2018-11-13 12:48:08 | | | | Last edited: by T!M |
|