I'm puzzled why the correct the overview of this film (copied carefully from the keep case) that I submitted and had approved has been replaced by the completely wrong overview I corrected? The running time and subtitles have also been changed back to their previous entries. The disc ID I submitted has been deleted entirely.

Who is doing the double-checking to keep the information accurate?

Nitrate

Quoting nitrate:

Quote:
I'm puzzled why the correct the overview of this film (copied carefully from the keep case) that I submitted and had approved has been replaced by the completely wrong overview I corrected? The running time and subtitles have also been changed back to their previous entries. The disc ID I submitted has been deleted entirely.

Who is doing the double-checking to keep the information accurate?

Nitrate

I see a number of questions here, nitrate. You used the box, whiich is well-known to contain errors. If a user had checked the ACTUAL runtime on the disc and it was different from that of the case then case is WRONG. Same is true for virtually everything on the disc versus the box data, the ONLY accurate source for any data is the disc itself.

As for your comment about Disc ID, there are known to be multiple disc IDs for any given title, not all but a significant number. Why is this true, none of us knows for sure, but it could be two different plants used to produce the discs, a second printing of a disc, etc. That said it is important for Invelos to capture the data on every possible disc ID for every title, yours has been captured by the system even though all you SEE is the most recent addition. This an area where you want to be careful accepting updates because you may obliterate your data. I want my local dfatabase to accurately reflect my collection so, if someone submits an ADDITIONAL Disc ID I will not allow it to overwrite my own locally.

I hope this helps you.

Skip