| Author |
Message |
  | T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 8,667 |
| | Posted: | | | | New Contribution Evaluate this contribution Profile Contribution Approved 2007-03-13 19:17:02 Image Contribution Approved 2007-03-13 19:17:02 |
|
| T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 8,667 |
| |
| T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 8,667 |
| |
| T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 8,667 |
| | Posted: | | | | It's still "Not Rated", but I changed the rating system from "Film" to "Television". Applied the newly available bold formatting to the overview text, and simplified episode list. Evaluate this contribution Profile Contribution Approved Nov 21 2008 6:43AM |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 |  Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Removal of non-Overview material, just because it on the back cover does not make it part of the Overview Evaluate this contribution *Updated Notes* Removal of non-Overview material, just because it on the back cover does not make it part of the Overview As is normal for this user he creates his own interpretations. This quote from a cha=acter does not addx anything to the SUMMARY *Updated Notes* Removal of non-Overview material, just because it on the back cover does not make it part of the Overview As is normal for this user he creates his own interpretations. This quote from a cha=acter does not addx anything to the SUMMARY. This has never been considered part of the Overview, I do not understand why this particular user is allowed to define things per his PERSONAL PREFERENCES Profile Contribution Approved Dec 11 2008 8:47PM | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video | | | | Last edited: by Winston Smith |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  | | Posts: 3,480 |
| | Posted: | | | | | | | ...James
"People fake a lot of human interactions, but I feel like I fake them all, and I fake them very well. That’s my burden, I guess." ~ Dexter Morgan |
|
| T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 8,667 |
| |
| Registered: March 22, 2007 | | Posts: 9 |
| |
| Registered: September 3, 2007 | | Posts: 163 |
| | Posted: | | | | | | |  |
|
| Registered: May 29, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,475 |
| |
| T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 8,667 |
| | Posted: | | | | Studios: there is no mention of "MTM Productions" anywhere: not on the cover, not on the discs, not in the credits - it's consistently "MTM Enterprises", so I don't see why a non-existing, not-credited studio name variant needs to be listed here. Re-audited cast and crew data: everything taken exactly as credited from the credits. Any common names as per the CLT, and any necessary, previously approved birth years from the forum's pinned "List of Accepted Birth Years with Documentation"-thread. Evaluate this contribution |
|
| T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 8,667 |
| | Posted: | | | | Studios: there is no mention of "MTM Productions" anywhere: not on the cover, not on the discs, not in the credits - it's consistently "MTM Enterprises", so I don't see why a not-credited studio name variant needs to be listed here. Re-audited cast and crew data: everything taken exactly as credited from the credits. Any common names as per the CLT, and any necessary, previously approved birth years from the forum's pinned "List of Accepted Birth Years with Documentation"-thread. Evaluate this contribution Profile Contribution Approved Feb 24 2014 3:25PM |
|
| Registered: May 29, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 3,475 |
| | Posted: | | | | New scans for your consideration. Evaluate this contribution Profile Contribution Approved Feb 24 2014 3:38PM Image Contribution Approved Feb 24 2014 3:38PM |
|
| T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 8,667 |
| | Posted: | | | | Removing the unnecessary and therefore invalid birth year for Tom Everett, as documented in the forum's pinned "List of proven INVALID Birth Years"-thread right here. Also, based on the findings in this thread, Mr. Palmisano's common name is the variant without the middle initial. Evaluate this contribution Profile Contribution Approved Oct 3 2014 4:59PM |
|
| T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 8,667 |
| | Posted: | | | | Propagating the previously accepted birth year for David Warner, as documented in the forum's pinned "List of Accepted Birth Years with Documentation"-thread right here. Evaluate this contribution Profile Contribution Approved Nov 28 2014 6:52PM |
|
| T!M | | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Reputation: | | Posts: 8,667 |
| | Posted: | | | | Propagating the previously accepted birth year for Gene Ross, as documented in the forum's pinned "List of Accepted Birth Years with Documentation"-thread right here. Evaluate this contribution Profile Contribution Approved Mar 18 2015 9:25AM |
|