As was explained in this post, The CLT results for this common name are suspect.

"Valérie Kaprisky" is credited in 22 titles (37 profiles)
"Valerie Kaprisky" is credited in 3 titles (5 profiles)

I have to agree with Tim... I have already gotten to the point where if you aren't going to take care of the threads that you are starting for common names... then I see no sense in trying to help you with them. No list of movies for each name variant... no keeping track of which name variant has how many titles. Just throwing out threads for each names and then forgetting about them. If you are not willing to take care of the threads you start then I can't see going through the trouble to help in them.

Quoting Addicted2DVD:

Quote:
Just throwing out threads for each names and then forgetting about them...

There are several ways to take this problem and try to correct it. I chose to review my collection in order to list the problems and open corresponding threads. This should be done very quickly, since T!M stated clearly those cases are pretty rare. As soon as the threads are complete (for my collection, I mean), I shall take in account data sent by other users, and complete with mine. Unfortunately, I have not enough time to do everything at the same time, but I think my method is the one which is the most efficient for me.

Sorry if it is not exactly what you wish.

PS. I hope those posts which have nothing to do with the main subject of the thread are not a way to try to make it derail. Methods should be discussed elsewhere, or by PM, not by hijacking a specific thread. I shall not answer here to any other question concerning method.

Quoting Addicted2DVD:

Quote:
The way you are doing it now I can't see helping any more then the couple of titles I already did.

Same here.

Quoting surfeur51:

Quote:
I think my method is the one which is the most efficient for me.

Of course it is, since you haven't done anything except repeatedly throwing out a "what's the common name for..."-question without any other input whatsoever. I can see how that's "efficient" for you, but it's pretty pointless as well - especially since, as this exchange proves, your method seems to alienate the people you're depending on to confirm credits for you. It's pretty much a self-fulfilling prophecy: you don't put in the effort, so others won't either, and the result is bound to be a failure. Though again, I can't help but wonder if that's not exactly what you're aiming for... If so, the only point you will have proven, though, is that people are more than willing to confirm credits for you if you put in some effort yourself as well, but less willing to do so when you're not bringing any input or even a bit of structure to these threads. No surprise there, really.

Bottom line: if you're at all serious about this, then put in the effort. No need to do a hundred straight away - just start with a few, but do them properly. If all this is just an attempt to make a point, and you have no real intent to follow through on any of these threads, then please don't bother creating a hundred more.

I really thought he wouldn't play another childish game. How dumb from me.