I'm sorry to make you vote again but Skip, the original contributor and lone "no" vote continues to add comments which I then edited to explain my rationale and links backing that rationale.
In order to make it easier for voters and screeners, I am resubmitting this profile to consolidate all the additions/changes and rationale in order to make it easier for the voters and screeners.
I will not edit this profile again or address "no" votes. I believe that this new contribution follows the rules and guidelines of Ken and invelos.
I have been very careful to insure this contributions accuracy since the first time I submitted it. But, like anyone I can make a mistake, if so I still believe this profile should be accepted according to Ken:
http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=345020&PageNum=2&messageID=889325#M889325.
Please note that I am not addressing Colin Maclachlan vs. Colin MacLachlan in this section. I will address that under the Cast section documentation.
Rating: Back cover.
MC: Back cover.
Studios: Universal Focus, not Universal Pictures, and Studio Canal start at the very beginning of the DVD. They are separate from Working Title, BBC and Tiger Aspects.
Additional sources to document these changes are correct:
- http://ftvdb.bfi.org.uk/sift/title/633562
- http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/review/309
- http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0249462/companycredits
- http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/201730/Billy-Elliot/credits
Crew:
3.5 data updated: Costume Designer, Make-Up Artists and Visual Effects: DVD end credits.
Cast:
Propagating Jamie Bell (1986) accepted BY: http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=250804&PageNum=7&messageID=661256#M661256.
The online and my local database differ: Colin Maclachlan vs. Colin MacLachlan. I submitted my initial contribution based on my understanding of the issue. But, after receiving a "no" vote I posted a query in the forums because I could not find the link.
When I see a "no" vote, I prefer to provide a direct link supporting my rationale so I posted this thread:
http://www.invelos.com/MessagePost.aspx?task=replyquote&TopicID=587682&MessageID=1701599.
Thanks to Pete and VirusPil for providing the link I was looking for in which Ken supports the way I have contributed this section of this profile:
http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=425379&PageNum=4&messageID=1340514#M1340514.
I think it is obvious that I put a lot of time and research into this single Cast member. It is not, as Skip claims, for lack of respect of the invelos community. Or, for any other reason he cited in both the forums and the voting page.
The reason is quite simple, I am not going to spend time on something that does not impact or contribute to the online database.
Uncredited Cast removed. There is no documentation for the Uncredited Cast. They are also a close match to IMDb including the use of the single quotation marks.
In the end credits there is a short note in the end credits which reads: Swan Lake appears... but there are no single quotation marks.
The removal of these Uncredited Cast is in compliance with Ken and invelos:
http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=430575&PageNum=3&messageID=1178884#M1178884.
Ken's statement on Uncredited Cast and my rationale for removing them:
http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=203219&PageNum=1&messageID=410114#M410114.
New scans for your consideration. The colors are much more accurate. For example, the covers are more aqua than the current blue and the sand on the bottom front should be white not gray. More data is also visible. Look at the left center back cover above the raised foot.
Evaluate this contribution
Profile Contribution Approved Feb 29 2012 6:26PM
Image Contribution Approved Feb 29 2012 6:26PM