|
|
This forum contains notes submitted with contributions for this profile. Please
consider the comments made by other users when contributing updates to this
profile.
This forum is view-only; new notes are posted as contributions are received.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
|
Page:
1 2 Previous Next
|
Contribution comments for [025193289223] (Locked) |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,911 |
| Posted: | | | | New Contribution Evaluate this contribution Profile Contribution Approved Mar 24 2007 1:48PM Image Contribution Approved Mar 24 2007 1:48PM | | | Signature banned: Reason out of date... |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 4,245 |
| | | Erik | It's a strange world. |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 422 |
| Posted: | | | | Studios - included the proper theatrical release studio and DVD distributor as per the film titles/rules. Features - added additional features found on the disc (verified with PowerDVD). Subtitles - per the disc (verified with PowerDVD). Audio Tracks - per the disc encode (verified with PowerDVD). Overview - from the cover. Disc Info - dual layer verified with VSO Inspector. Evaluate this contribution Profile Contribution Approved May 10 2007 9:43PM | | | Erik
"Has it ever occurred to you, man, that given the nature of all this new stuff, that, uh, instead of running around blaming me, that this whole thing might just be, not, you know, not just such a simple, but uh - you know?" -- The Dude, The Big Lebowski
|
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 24 |
| Posted: | | | | Studios Updated to actual Studios Subtitles Updated to match disc (English Subs Added) Audio Tracks Updated to match Disc (French, not Finnish) Overtaken from back of case Disc Info Added Front and back cover scans (Note: This is a lenticular cover, and due to that it's very difficult to get a good scan. I did my best, leaving a shadow of the other part of the image behind) Evaluate this contribution Profile Contribution Declined May 11 2007 6:59PM Image Contribution Approved May 11 2007 6:59PM |
| Registered: March 24, 2007 | Posts: 16 |
| | Registered: March 23, 2007 | Posts: 70 |
| Posted: | | | | * Hi-Rez Cover Scans * Overview Evaluate this contribution Profile Contribution Declined May 12 2007 7:03PM Image Contribution Declined May 12 2007 7:03PM |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 37 |
| Posted: | | | | - fixed audio track channels (verified with cover and PowerDVD 4.0) - modified overview to match cover: at his hilarious best, Irwin "Fletch" -> at his hilarious best as Irwin "Fletch" expose -> exposé It'll -> it'll stay alive to meet his deadline. -> stay alive till the deadline. Evaluate this contribution Profile Contribution Approved May 17 2007 5:40PM |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,667 |
| Posted: | | | | There are no separate "interviews" on this disc, just two featurettes ('Just Charge It to the Underhills: Remembering Fletch' and 'From John Cocktoastin to Harry S. Truman: Disguises'). Obviously, both featurettes do contain cast and crew interviews, as basically any featurette does, but IMHO that doesn't mean we should use both the 'Featurettes' and the 'Interviews' checkbox. They're still just featurettes, and the 'Interviews' checkbox should only be used when there are separate cast and/crew interviews on the disc, not embedded into some kind of featurette. Evaluate this contribution Profile Contribution Approved Jun 12 2007 7:33PM |
| | Erik | It's a strange world. |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 422 |
| Posted: | | | | Case Type - Slip Cover checked since it, uh, comes with one. Lenticular, IIRC. Evaluate this contribution Profile Contribution Approved Aug 31 2007 8:45PM | | | Erik
"Has it ever occurred to you, man, that given the nature of all this new stuff, that, uh, instead of running around blaming me, that this whole thing might just be, not, you know, not just such a simple, but uh - you know?" -- The Dude, The Big Lebowski
|
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,667 |
| | | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,667 |
| Posted: | | | | Applied bold & italics to overview. Corrected cast and crew, all re-verified exactly as credited from the actual film credits, using the "credited as" feature where necessary - extensively researched on the internet and fully supported by Invelos' own "credit lookup tool" results. Evaluate this contribution *Updated Notes* Applied bold & italics to overview. Corrected cast and crew, all re-verified exactly as credited from the actual film credits, using the "credited as" feature where necessary - extensively researched on the internet and fully supported by Invelos' own "credit lookup tool" results. EDIT: I'll let Ken Cole address the unfounded no-vote ( link): Quote: It is not necessary to document the source of the common name, outside the use of the CLT. [...] Users who prefer more rigidly documented common names are free to enforce those rules on their local data. *Updated Notes* Applied bold & italics to overview. Corrected cast and crew, all re-verified exactly as credited from the actual film credits, using the "credited as" feature where necessary - extensively researched on the internet and fully supported by Invelos' own "credit lookup tool" results. CLT-results: David W. Harper [David Harper]: 41 [30]. Alison LaPlaca [Alison Laplaca]: 55 [18]. Arnold F. Turner [Arnold Turner]: 169 [101]. Franne Golde [Franie Golde]: 17 [5]. Richard Portman [Richard R. Portman]: 665 [25]. Additionally, I'll let Ken Cole address the unfounded no-votes ( link): Quote: It is not necessary to document the source of the common name, outside the use of the CLT. [...] Users who prefer more rigidly documented common names are free to enforce those rules on their local data. Profile Contribution Approved Apr 13 2009 3:54PM | | | Last edited: by T!M |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,667 |
| Posted: | | | | The current profile contains a cast entry for "David W. Harper, credited as David Harper". Further research has shown me that this use of the "credited as" feature is no longer necessary, probably as a result from more and more IMDb-mined data being corrected. Have a look at Invelos' own "credit lookup tool" results: David Harper: 38 entries, David W. Harper: 33 entries (mostly the same titles, but then mined from IMDb). Since "David Harper" is now the most-credited form, he can simply be entered AS CREDITED into this particular profile. Evaluate this contribution Profile Contribution Approved May 5 2009 7:25AM |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Correction to Alison LaPlaca [Alison Laplaca] to AS CREDITED status. CLT shows exactly the same results for Alison Laplaca and for Alison LaPlaca, both show 59 Titles (99 Profiles) there is NO Documentation provided to support that Alison LaPlaca is correct, so all we can use in this case is AS CREDITED Evaluate this contribution *Updated Notes* Correction to Alison LaPlaca [Alison Laplaca] to AS CREDITED status. CLT shows exactly the same results for Alison Laplaca and for Alison LaPlaca, both show 59 Titles (99 Profiles) there is NO Documentation provided to support that Alison LaPlaca is correct, so all we can use in this case is AS CREDITED For Tim: As I see it you are dead wriong I checked tghe CLT and the results are the same for both variations, YOU have oprovided NO documentation to support your claim. Now I realize that you are limited for sopace, so feel free to PM me and clarify whatever you wish, but as I see it now you are WRONG PERIOD. *Updated Notes* Correction to Alison LaPlaca [Alison Laplaca] to AS CREDITED status. CLT shows exactly the same results for Alison Laplaca and for Alison LaPlaca, both show 59 Titles (99 Profiles) there is NO Documentation provided to support that Alison LaPlaca is correct, so all we can use in this case is AS CREDITED For Tim: As I see it you are dead wriong I checked tghe CLT and the results are the same for both variations, YOU have oprovided NO documentation to support your claim. Now I realize that you are limited for sopace, so feel free to PM me and clarify whatever you wish, but as I see it now you are WRONG PERIOD. You need to LOOK closer Tim, check the CLT fo r BOTH versions not just the ONE that you think it is. You will find that both yield the SAME results, due to the Cap recognition problem thus invalidating the CLT...Now had you thouroughly researched this annd explained it due to the cap issue that would be one thing, but you did not. Your research was both faulty and completel *Updated Notes* Let me try and restate this. i don't understand qwhere Tim or anyone else is coming from. If you check the CLT for Alison LaPlaca and for Alison Laplaca you get exactly the same list. There fore ther is not sufficient data to presume one is the Common Name. I believe that Tim reached a conclusion based on an undocumented assumption and one that certainly was NOT supported by the CLT. It appears to me that this relates to known program shortcoming in dealing with upper and lower case correctly. I could understand this if Tim were stating that it relates directly to the Upper/Lower case issue and his listing was for LaPlaca, but that is not what he has claimed, then or NOW. I am cretainly not averse to pulling the contribution but not without a better explanation from someone. as I see it right now Tim was wrong then and NOW. So please somebody try and explain this. *Updated Notes* Let me try and restate this. i don't understand qwhere Tim or anyone else is coming from. If you check the CLT for Alison LaPlaca and for Alison Laplaca you get exactly the same list. There fore ther is not sufficient data to presume one is the Common Name. I believe that Tim reached a conclusion based on an undocumented assumption and one that certainly was NOT supported by the CLT. It appears to me that this relates to known program shortcoming in dealing with upper and lower case correctly. I could understand this if Tim were stating that it relates directly to the Upper/Lower case issue and his listing was for LaPlaca, but that is not what he has claimed, then or NOW. I am cretainly not averse to pulling the contribution but not without a better explanation from someone. as I see it right now Tim was wrong then and NOW. So please somebody try and explain this. So far based on what I have seen of previous notes, CLT results, etc. ALL No votes on thsi are completely and *Updated Notes* Let me try and restate this. i don't understand qwhere Tim or anyone else is coming from. If you check the CLT for Alison LaPlaca and for Alison Laplaca you get exactly the same list. There fore ther is not sufficient data to presume one is the Common Name. I believe that Tim reached a conclusion based on an undocumented assumption and one that certainly was NOT supported by the CLT. It appears to me that this relates to known program shortcoming in dealing with upper and lower case correctly. I could understand this if Tim were stating that it relates directly to the Upper/Lower case issue and his listing was for LaPlaca, but that is not what he has claimed, then or NOW. I am cretainly not averse to pulling the contribution but not without a better explanation from someone. as I see it right now Tim was wrong then and NOW. So please somebody try and explain this. So far based on what I have seen of previous notes, CLT results, etc. ALL No votes on this are completely inv Profile Contribution Declined Sep 22 2009 6:52AM | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video | | | Last edited: by Winston Smith |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,667 |
| Posted: | | | | The current profile contains a cast entry for "Irene Olga López" (note the accent). However, this actress is actually mostly credited without the accent, as Irene Olga Lopez. Have a look at Invelos' own "credit lookup tool" results: Irene Olga Lopez: 81 titles, Irene Olga López: 60 titles (mostly still incorrect IMDb-mined entries). Since "Irene Olga Lopez" is now the most-credited form, this credit which actually does use the accent needs the addition of her common name. Evaluate this contribution Profile Contribution Approved Nov 28 2009 10:33AM |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,667 |
| Posted: | | | | The current profile contains a cast entry for "Arnold F. Turner, credited as Arnold Turner". Further research has shown me that this use of the "credited as" feature is no longer necessary, probably as a result from more and more IMDb-mined data being corrected. Have a look at Invelos' own "credit lookup tool" results: Arnold Turner: 51 titles, Arnold F. Turner: 37 titles (partly still incorrect IMDb-mined data). Since "Arnold Turner" is now the most-credited form, he can simply be entered AS CREDITED into this particular profile. Evaluate this contribution Profile Contribution Approved Dec 29 2009 6:43PM |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,667 |
| Posted: | | | | The Gregory McDonald and Alison LaPlaca changes are caused by a new automated contribution filter as explained by Ken here. Evaluate this contribution Profile Contribution Approved Nov 6 2010 12:10PM |
|
|
|
Page:
1 2 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|