| Message |
Details |
Quoting ObiKen:
Quote:
My understanding is you need to provide a reason(s) when upgrading existing scans.
I downloaded the profile in question, and it was clear to me the current back cover was not a slipcover scan but a scan of the internal keep case cover still inside the plastic jacket (500x588 pixels). The current front cover (500x625 pixels) was from the slipcover, but the black levels looked washed out like charcoal.
Hope that helps.
Neither of the existing images are mine and I believe the existing front cover may not be a scan. I did provide a comment... is there something wrong with what I left because that's never been a problem. As you mention the existing back cover isn't even from the slipcover. | Posted: Topic Replies: 6, Topic Views: 339 |
 |
Quoting GSyren:
Quote:
Long shot, but is there any chance that there is an edition mixup, so that the UPCs don't match?
No, the UPC matches and this is the version with the keepcase and slipcover. There is a different UPC for the Deluxe Boxset (hard chipboard box) that houses a digipak. There is also an Ultimate Limited Edition version with all the swag but it comes with the Deluxe Boxset.
Quoting Kluge:
Quote:
Maybe you posted a cover scan instead of a slipcover scan?
No, it's the scan of the slipcover and I didn't scan the wrap. | Posted: Topic Replies: 6, Topic Views: 339 |
|
Do you care about Adult titles showing and are you using parental control? Is the Hide adult titles in online collection checked?
If not, why not bump the age rating to 19 or remove parental control. | Posted: Topic Replies: 12, Topic Views: 4466 |
|
They appear correctly for me when viewing your collection.
Scooby-Doo! and Guess Who?: The Complete Second Season is shows # 2363
Scream / Scream VI: 2-Movie Collection is showing # 2368
This one shows the following
Evil Dead Rise is showing # 806
Divas Live/99 is # 678 | Posted: Topic Replies: 12, Topic Views: 4466 |
|
Anyone have any insight on why my image contributions for Ignite Films 4K release of Bride of Re-Animator would be declined twice. Both times there were zero votes on the contribution. The first time the profile was accepted but the images were declined. I resubmitted the images only, but it's strangely showing images and profile (???) were declined. These are high quality scans of the slipcover and the wide retailer release doesn't get released until December 2026.
https://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=1135872&PageNum=LAST | Posted: Topic Replies: 6, Topic Views: 339 |
|
Quoting mreeder50:
Quote:
Try contributing them again as is.
Not worth it based on some of the voters. | Posted: Topic Replies: 20, Topic Views: 6403 |
|
Quoting primetime21:
Quote:
Yeah like people who insist features on the Blu-ray of a UHD/Blu-ray combo belong on the main profile even though that's not what the rules say because that's how they catalog their collection 
That's not what the rules state. When a release has the same film but on different media types, a child profile for the inferior media type is optional. All features are supposed to be included in the main profile, just like how you include the different media types in the main profile. When it comes to audio and video formats then the main profile only uses those from the highest resolution format. | Posted: Topic Replies: 19, Topic Views: 8107 |
|
| I would agree with your assessment. | Posted: Topic Replies: 3, Topic Views: 1965 |
|
| I see this is now OBE, but I agree with you. Unfortunately, some contributors what the database to reflex how they catalog their collection rather than what the actual rules state. | Posted: Topic Replies: 19, Topic Views: 8107 |
|