Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 467 |
| Posted: | | | | This is not going to work. A no vote for me too. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 1,136 |
| Posted: | | | | I have to add a No to this as well
Good idea, but terrible in practice | | | Signature? We don't need no stinking... hang on, this has been done... blast [oooh now in Widescreen] Ah... well you see.... I thought I'd say something more interesting... but cannot think of anything..... oh well And to those of you who have disabled viewing of these signature files "hello" (or not) Registered: July 27, 2004 |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,005 |
| |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 467 |
| Posted: | | | | And to confuse myself, I have no idea what they call it in my country |
|