Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1... 7 8 9 10 11  Previous   Next
Chinese names
Author Message
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributornorthbloke
Registered: March 15, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 5,459
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting TheFly:
Quote:
Quoting northbloke:
Quote:
If the rules were adjusted to say that for the purposes of DVD Profiler the fields first, middle and last names referred purely to the order the names appear on the screen, regardless of cultural origins - would that cause any problems for anyone?

What would you do in an instance like my example earlier where the same person is credited in both orders?


That situation I would say goes to personal choice - if you prefer to build the credits based on the japanese text, do so. If you're happier using the english text - that's fine too. All you have to do is specify which one you used in the contribution notes.
The other option would be to list both using dividers, but that's above and beyond.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantTheFly
Registered: March 18, 2007
United Kingdom Posts: 103
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting northbloke:
Quote:
That situation I would say goes to personal choice - if you prefer to build the credits based on the japanese text, do so. If you're happier using the english text - that's fine too. All you have to do is specify which one you used in the contribution notes.
The other option would be to list both using dividers, but that's above and beyond.

If we do this, don't we end up with a database polluted with numerous duplicated names in the two orders? The usual way around this is to determine the common name then use Credited As, but that doesn't really apply here. Unless you're suggesting something like:

[Cast - Western order]
Mai Nakahara as Mai Tokiha
...

[Cast - Asian order]
Mai Nakahara [Nakahara Mai] as Mai Tokiha
...

I'm sure you'll agree this is horrible. Much more effective is to rename the fields "Given Name" and "Family Name", then we only need a single entry.

The Common Name, in my opinion, needs to reflect the person's actual name, not how they are credited on a particular DVD. That's the whole point of the Credited As field. Given that "First Name" and "Last Name" do not have universal meanings, whereas "Given Name" and "Family Name" do, I believe changing to the latter would eliminate the confusion.
 Last edited: by TheFly
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributornorthbloke
Registered: March 15, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 5,459
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Actually I think it's perfectly acceptable to use "credited as" to show the different order.
You have to remember it only displays both names like that on the contribution page. In the program, you only see "credited as", so you would see:

[Cast - English text]
Mai Nakahara as Mai Tokiha
...

[Cast - Japanese text]
Nakahara Mai as Mai Tokiha
...

but both entries would link to the same cast member.
And you have to remember that Ken has specifically stated that the common name does not need to be the person's actual name for the linking to work. So I think to look at this problem from that point of view is false.
I think we need to consider ease of use, and ease of implementation as much more important in the long run.
 Last edited: by northbloke
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantGraveworm
Registered: April 7, 2007
United Kingdom Posts: 357
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting EnryWiki:
Quote:
In the English language, Last Name and Family Name are synonyms even when talking about Chinese last names.

Here is an example from a randomly picked web site:

http://www.chinapage.com/biography/lastname.html

Hmm interesting except the character doesn't mean last name and A wife's name stays the same after marriage. Other than that it's pretty good. 
 Last edited: by Graveworm
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWinston Smith
Don't be discommodious
Registered: March 13, 2007
United States Posts: 21,610
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting northbloke:
Quote:
Simple questions Skip:

Is Gong Li's common name Gong//Li or Li//Gong?
Is Chow Yun-Fat's common name Chow//Yun-Fat or Yun-Fat//Chow?



Simple answer, since I have already answered it. I don't care. I care that you NOT muck up Credited As.

Skip
ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here

Billy Video
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantGraveworm
Registered: April 7, 2007
United Kingdom Posts: 357
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting northbloke:
Quote:
Simple questions Skip:

Is Gong Li's common name Gong//Li or Li//Gong?
Is Chow Yun-Fat's common name Chow//Yun-Fat or Yun-Fat//Chow?


It doesn't matter at all since all the common name does is link all films the person appears in.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributornorthbloke
Registered: March 15, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 5,459
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Graveworm:
Quote:
Quoting northbloke:
Quote:
Simple questions Skip:

Is Gong Li's common name Gong//Li or Li//Gong?
Is Chow Yun-Fat's common name Chow//Yun-Fat or Yun-Fat//Chow?


It doesn't matter at all since all the common name does is link all films the person appears in.


I know it doesn't matter which one we pick, but we still need to pick one! And we need to say in the rules which one to pick for future reference.
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar Contributorschizzzo
Registered: March 20, 2007
Germany Posts: 78
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
The problem is that we are confrontated with a couple of problems/unanswered questions. First of all:

What does first/middle/last name means?

---------------------

If first=given, middle=second and last=surname (and to me it seems that the community thinks this way) then the next question is:

How to parse asian names for the COMMON NAME? Before we can answer this question:

How to romanize asian names written in asian characters in the film credits?

How to deal with the problem "Yu" or "Yoo" (I'm sure there are international standards for it and we should use the standards for english speaking part of this world)? Should we write "Yun Fat" or "Yun-Fat" or "Yun-fat" (I'm sure there are also international standards for it)?

It must be clear that "Yun Fat" is ONE name (as "Bonham Carter" is ONE name)

Why should we do this? To get a consistent database with a working linking system where we can sort names alphabetically! (Can anyone tell me how asian sorts their names?  )

---------------------

If first=first, middle=middle and last=last name on screen, ok, but what is a name? Is Bonham a middle or part of the last name? Is "Fat" a middle or part of the last name?

And what about sorting alphabetically?

This way of parsing is much easier for "newbies" but there are as many problems as in the first mentioned solution.

---------------------

And no one, defintitely NO ONE want to change the appearances of the names as on screen, that what are the "credit as" functionality is for.

But the first question to be answered:
What does first/middle/last name means?

And that's Ken's job! Only he knows where he wants to go with the name database.

We should go step by step or we get lost in endless discussions.
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantGraveworm
Registered: April 7, 2007
United Kingdom Posts: 357
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Well at the moment we are supposed to pick the most common according to the credit lookup tool. That leaves the problem that it may change over time. If I had a choice it would be the earliest entry in the database since
1) That will never change
2) That's the definitive profile, each time you want to credit an alias all you have to do is satisfy the voters and screeners that the earliest profile and current profile are the same person and equally importantly if there is a mistake that's the one you need to show is not the same.
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantGraveworm
Registered: April 7, 2007
United Kingdom Posts: 357
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting schizzzo:
Quote:
The problem is that we are confrontated with a couple of problems/unanswered questions. First of all:

What does first/middle/last name means?


For a lot of Chinese actors their names are a phrase like Morning Sun or Happy Dragon etc. So they are not family or given names. It's all to do with the limited number of surnames.

Quote:

How to parse asian names for the COMMON NAME? Before we can answer this question:

How to romanize asian names written in asian characters in the film credits?

How to deal with the problem "Yu" or "Yoo" (I'm sure there are international standards for it and we should use the standards for english speaking part of this world)? Should we write "Yun Fat" or "Yun-Fat" or "Yun-fat" (I'm sure there are also international standards for it)?


There are international standards but you need to know where in China they were born

Quote:
Why should we do this? To get a consistent database with a working linking system where we can sort names alphabetically! (Can anyone tell me how asian sorts their names?  )

It depends on the number of strokes and their direction on the character. Chinese children spend a long time learning to use a dictionary.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributornorthbloke
Registered: March 15, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 5,459
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quote:
If first=first, middle=middle and last=last name on screen, ok, but what is a name? Is Bonham a middle or part of the last name? Is "Fat" a middle or part of the last name?

And what about sorting alphabetically?

This way of parsing is much easier for "newbies" but there are as many problems as in the first mentioned solution.

I think this is still my preferred option. You say there would be problems with names like Bonham Carter or Yun Fat, but as you say - even though they are multiple words, they are still single names and should be parsed as such.
As far as I can tell, the only problem with this solution is what I've bolded above - the sorting. The question is - is it a worthwhile sacrifice or is it something Ken can accomodate with an update?
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributornorthbloke
Registered: March 15, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 5,459
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Graveworm:
Quote:
Well at the moment we are supposed to pick the most common according to the credit lookup tool.

The problem with using the credit lookup tool in this situation is that there hasn't been a consistent way of entering the names into Profiler so we end up with skewed results.
At least with western names you know that even if they type in the wrong name, they've typed it in the right way round! With asian names we don't even have that guarantee!
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorRHo
Registered: March 13, 2007
Posts: 2,759
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting northbloke:
Quote:
The main question I need answering is:

If the rules were adjusted to say that for the purposes of DVD Profiler the fields first, middle and last names referred purely to the order the names appear on the screen, regardless of cultural origins - would that cause any problems for anyone?

Yes, linking would be broken if the same person is listed as "given name family name" in one film and as "family name given name" in another.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorRHo
Registered: March 13, 2007
Posts: 2,759
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Graveworm:
Quote:
Quoting northbloke:
Quote:
Simple questions Skip:
Is Gong Li's common name Gong//Li or Li//Gong?
Is Chow Yun-Fat's common name Chow//Yun-Fat or Yun-Fat//Chow?

It doesn't matter at all since all the common name does is link all films the person appears in.

It does matter! The fields are not only used for linking purposes. They are displayed prominently in profiler's credit display and have semantics of there own (indicated by the field names).
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorTheMadMartian
Alien with an attitude
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 13,201
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting skipnet50:
Quote:
When you IGNORE what I am saying, north, i am left with the conclusion that you don't understand me. I have been talking about this from the first post and for three years. I have even mentioned it to you in PM, which you also blew off, so i conclude you don't understand...what else would you like for me to conclude. You are the FIRST person I have seen in three years FINALLY willing to acknowledge what I am saying. Talking to people works, talking at people doesn't.

Skip


Sorry Skip but you are the one who has been ignoring what everyone else is saying.  We have ALWAYS been talking about the common name, the one that is parsed.  We NEVER said a thing about changing the 'credited as' name.

If you go back to pages 3 and 4, you will see that we suggested entering a credit of 'Chow Yun Fat' as 'Yun Fat/ /Chow credited as Chow Yun Fat'.

I am not trying to be rude but, if you are going to join a discussion, at least know what it is that is being discussed.  We could have saved a lot of time, and animosity, had you done that before jumping into this discussion. 
No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorTheMadMartian
Alien with an attitude
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United States Posts: 13,201
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting schizzzo:
Quote:
But the first question to be answered:
What does first/middle/last name means?

And that's Ken's job! Only he knows where he wants to go with the name database.

We should go step by step or we get lost in endless discussions.


I am not Ken, and won't presume to speak for him, but I do stand by my previous statement...

Ken is an American and the Amverican standard, when labeling name fields is as follows:

First Name = first given name
Middle Name = second given name
Last Name = surname

In my opinion, and it is just my opinion, absent any clarification from Ken we should go with the standard of the country where the program was written.
No dictator, no invader can hold an imprisoned population by force of arms forever.
There is no greater power in the universe than the need for freedom.
Against this power, governments and tyrants and armies cannot stand.
The Centauri learned this lesson once.
We will teach it to them again.
Though it take a thousand years, we will be free.
- Citizen G'Kar
    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1... 7 8 9 10 11  Previous   Next