| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 17,325 |
| | Posted: | | | | Exactly in this case... going strictly by the rules this one would break a rule either way you did it. As you can tell by this poll most people do believe in this case the extras listed in the paragraph is part of the overview... so if they are left out it is breaking the Overview rule... if they are added in it is breaking the part about special features in the overview... so no matter what in a case like this you automatically have a rule broken... as the rules are written now. | | | | Pete |
|
| Registered: March 29, 2007 | Reputation:  |  Posts: 4,479 |
| | Posted: | | | | Quoting Forget_the_Rest: Quote:
The difference compared with typos in the overview is that the rule also says to copy exactly. You can't copy it exactly if you miss them out. So on that basis, it would be a violation to miss them out. And the rules precise : " Never include Extra features". As it is a precision that follows "copy exactly", it clearly must be applied. I know for typos, though I think it is the most stupid rule ever written, just followed by title rule which leads to things like "T4xi". | | | | Images from movies |
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | | Posts: 21,610 |
| | Posted: | | | | Bugsy said it bets....
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!!
CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it.
Outta here
Billy Video |
|