Author |
Message |
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,022 |
| Posted: | | | | He is attempting to contribute crap scans to replace good, for the following reason on his contribution notes;
"I originally contributed this DVD + Scans & would like to be credited for it."
Titles include those below I have picked up so far, hopefully the powers that be will flag this contributor.
Turner & Hooch Barbara streisand - timeless And the band played on | | | |
|
Registered: March 18, 2007 | Posts: 426 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting richierich: Quote:
"I originally contributed this DVD + Scans & would like to be credited for it."
Oh boy |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 1,339 |
| Posted: | | | | sounds fun... i assume this is a R2 problem? | | | -JoN |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 3,480 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting ruineddaydreams: Quote: sounds fun... i assume this is a R2 problem? Nope. Just finished my voting. All R1 for me. Tons of them. | | | ...James
"People fake a lot of human interactions, but I feel like I fake them all, and I fake them very well. That’s my burden, I guess." ~ Dexter Morgan | | | Last edited: by m.cellophane |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,293 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting richierich: Quote: ... for the following reason on his contribution notes;
"I originally contributed this DVD + Scans & would like to be credited for it." How sad is that... I almost pity anyone who has such low self esteem they feel they need recognition for a few scans so much they'll try to mess up the database. | | | It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong |
|
| mlr | HearAnyGoodStoriesLately? |
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 173 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting richierich: Quote: He is attempting to contribute crap scans to replace good, for the following reason on his contribution notes;
"I originally contributed this DVD + Scans & would like to be credited for it."
Titles include those below I have picked up so far, hopefully the powers that be will flag this contributor.
Turner & Hooch Barbara streisand - timeless And the band played on Another one... Our Sons |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,293 |
| Posted: | | | | OK, he just lost any sympathy... I checked the one I found (Cactus Jack, R2) back at IVS...
Barry did the 2nd update (of 4) to the original profile (he did NOT originally contribute it... and FWIW the last update was mine!) and NEVER contributed an image (vote 666 was original images contributor, bredatle was the person who updated them).
Not only is he sad enough to want recognition for his old submissions, he's so sad he wants recognition for other people's submissions! | | | It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 1,339 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting m.cellophane: Quote: Quoting ruineddaydreams:
Quote: sounds fun... i assume this is a R2 problem? Nope. Just finished my voting. All R1 for me. Tons of them. bah - thats what i get from looking at the flags... | | | -JoN |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 742 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Voltaire53: Quote: OK, he just lost any sympathy... Does that mean he actually had any sympathy from you to begin with? I mean, even if he happened to be the original contributor, this is even more ridiculous than arguing 40 pages about H/B/C or H//BC. And surely nothing to sympathize with under any conditions.... | | | Lutz |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,293 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Darxon: Quote: Quoting Voltaire53:
Quote: OK, he just lost any sympathy... Does that mean he actually had any sympathy from you to begin with? Well, as I said above, I almost felt pity for someone with such low self esteem they need recognition for doing a few scans years ago. | | | It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,652 |
| Posted: | | | | This strikes me as being incredibly petty, Barry, that is, and not the comments posted in this thread. I cannot believe anyone would destroy a profile just for 'recognition'. Surely a correct profile is far better than being recognised as a contributor? At least that is my opinion and I will stick to it! | | | <---------Mithrandir, Laverne and Shirley Caroline |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 742 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Voltaire53: Quote: Quoting Darxon:
Quote: Quoting Voltaire53:
Quote: OK, he just lost any sympathy... Does that mean he actually had any sympathy from you to begin with?
Well, as I said above, I almost felt pity for someone with such low self esteem they need recognition for doing a few scans years ago. In my book, this (Barry's) behavior is simply pathetic, no pity, no sympathy from my side. | | | Lutz |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 235 |
| |
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,022 |
| Posted: | | | | yes Mikl - but I thought it important to highlight these contributions simply as some have already apparently been accepted according to his stats | | | |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Yes I did, mikkel. You wouldn't believe the response I got. This guy seems to have some real serious ego problems. But he has apparently decidede to move on.
Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
|
| Kevin | Registered March 22, 2001 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 609 |
| Posted: | | | | Heh. Good thing I read the previous votes before I voted on his "Matt Helm" scans.
In the immortal words of Daffy Duck...
"It's mine you understand? Mine mine mine!!!!" |
|