Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

Invelos Forums->Posts by dee1959jay Page: 1 2 3 ...7  Previous   Next
Message Details
Yes, you need HDMI 2.0 and HDCP 2.2.

Mind you, HDMI 2.1 is coming. But then again, there will always be new things on the horizon.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 129, Topic Views: 6266
Maybe I remember this wrongly, but isn't it true that since there is an Invelos autofilter in place, this might end up with I. in the First Name field and A.L. in the Middle Name field (within the framework of the endless bickering on name parsing we used to have)?
Posted:
Topic Replies: 10, Topic Views: 205
The upscaling of blu-rays and DVDs to UHD on the Oppo should be better than on the XBox though. So not all is lost. 

I hope you can find a way to eliminate those switching issues, although if there was an easy way you would have found it by now, I'm sure.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 129, Topic Views: 6266
Happy 2018 to both Invelos and all fellow users! 
Posted:
Topic Replies: 7, Topic Views: 306
Noticed that too some time ago. Must be a bug. Removing the parent profile and then adding it again including child profiles might work, if I remember correctly.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 7, Topic Views: 268
In order to create a new profile (whether by UPC/EAN or by Disc ID), the box "Download profile from Invelos" at the bottom of the Add DVD to Collection screen must NOT be ticked. Please verify this is the case before creating a new profile.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 7, Topic Views: 331
Posted:
Topic Replies: 29, Topic Views: 8185
I see, my bad. If it was (originally) sold in the UK with an Italian title and (slip)cover, then that is indeed a valid entry for the UK locality.

And if it has been re-released with a British title and cover, an alternate version profile is the way to go.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 8, Topic Views: 556
Did you mention in your contribution notes that the existing profile is for the wrong locality?
Posted:
Topic Replies: 8, Topic Views: 556
Based on the responses to my questions, I think I would enter them, as they are clearly considered to be part of the main crew by the film makers and do seem to fit the roles as listed in the Invelos crew table.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 32, Topic Views: 1215
What I can't see on the pics as posted is whether or not the individual season sets have an EAN/UPC.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 16, Topic Views: 1293
OK, second question: are the on set crew members credited in roughly the same place as their "regular" (without prefix) colleagues or in a different section of the crew credits?

Once again, I'm trying to establish whether or not the film makers see them as main crew or not, which might be a consideration.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 32, Topic Views: 1215
Someone who arranges Halloween performances? 
Posted:
Topic Replies: 32, Topic Views: 1215
One question. Are "regular" visual/special effects supervisors and/or art directors (i.e. without the "on set" prefix) being credited as well?

Trying to find out whether the on set crew members are main or secondary crew, which might be a consideration for entering them or not.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 32, Topic Views: 1215
Ace has got a point too. Question is: do the repackaged season sets have an EAN/UPC of their own, and if so, is it the same as the originally released season sets? Is the cover art the same (identical or to a large extent)?

If the EAN/UPC is the same and the cover art is the same as well, then I agree with Ace that there is insufficient ground to create alternate profiles (based on just different SRP and release date). If any of these two are different, then alternate profiles are the way to go.

More here.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 16, Topic Views: 1293
Agreed.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 16, Topic Views: 1293
The missing font could be Tahoma TrueType - it seems DVDProfiler needs this. Check whether you have  Tahoma.ttf installed.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 38, Topic Views: 1871
Sounds like you may need to open a support ticket.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 3, Topic Views: 489
You can (assuming your on-line collection is up-to-date), with the exception of any cover scans you had made for yourself; these always come from the Invelos central database.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 1, Topic Views: 432
That's what I was saying, yes.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 14, Topic Views: 1288
Ah, I see. Not formatting, indeed. In any case: listings of special features have no business in an Overview and a contribution containing them should be declined. If this somehow mysteriously appears in any contribution of yours, it would be best not to tick the box in front of "Overview" in your contribution screen, i.e. not to submit the Overview change as part of your contribution. Otherwise you risk getting your contribution declined for no other reason than the mysterious Overview changes.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 14, Topic Views: 1288
Not necessarily. There are some Invelos autofilters in place and I have seen this before. In Overviews this seems related to formatting.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 14, Topic Views: 1288
For the record: I was wrong to make an unqualified statement. I will however maintain that the exceptions Kathy rightfully mentioned to not apply to the case at hand.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 17, Topic Views: 1967
No. There are contribution rules in place and they must be followed. As the Martian pointed out, the rules tell us to use the title from the front cover, not the back cover. Period.

Whether or not these rules should be changed or not is a different discussion altogether, which can take place in the Contribution Rules Committee forum.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 17, Topic Views: 1967
The only problem with that is that your on-line collection won't accommodate any local cover scans. In your on-line collection, covers are always taken from the central Invelos database.
Posted:
Topic Replies: 1, Topic Views: 559
Invelos Forums->Posts by dee1959jay Page: 1 2 3 ...7  Previous   Next