Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

Invelos Forums->Posts by scotthm Page: 1 2 3 4  Previous   Next
Message Details
Quoting irascian:
Quote:
My copy of Mumbai Police was purchased from Amazon so definitely not a bootleg.

Purchasing from Amazon is no guarantee of legitimacy.

---------------
Posted:
Topic Replies: 7, Topic Views: 337
Mine are just mixed in with everything else, but if I did want to identify "holiday" movies I'd probably use either TAGS or CUSTOM GENRES.

---------------
Posted:
Topic Replies: 7, Topic Views: 385
Harry Stradling
Angel Face
Her Cardboard Lover


Harry Stradling, Jr.
Little Big Man


(Also, you have Dark Journey listed twice under Harry Stradling.)

---------------
Posted:
Topic Replies: 25, Topic Views: 603
Harry Stradling, Sr.
The Young Philadelphians

Harry Stradling, Jr.
Support Your Local Gunfighter
Support Your Local Sheriff

Harry Stradling
The Barkleys of Broadway
Bathing Beauty
The Citadel
The Corsican Brothers
Dark Journey
The Devil and Miss Jones
Easter Parade
Easy to Wed
A Face in the Crowd
Forever Female
Guys and Dolls
The Human Comedy
Jamaica Inn
Maisie Gets Her Man
Swing Shift Maisie
A Millionaire for Christy
Mr. & Mrs. Smith
My Fair Lady
The Picture of Dorian Gray
A Streetcar Named Desire
Tension
Thrill of a Romance
White Cargo
The Yellow Cab Man

---------------
Posted:
Topic Replies: 25, Topic Views: 603
IMO, location crew should be included if they work directly with The Director of the picture.  Unit crew are usually filming scenes without the direct supervision of The Director.

---------------
Posted:
Topic Replies: 24, Topic Views: 813
A spelling error after loading xml:



An error while scrolling through my collection:



I'm finding an alarmingly high number of less than desirable images in my collection.

---------------
Posted:
Topic Replies: 17, Topic Views: 714
I would check to see that the VM's network adapter is in Bridged mode and not NAT mode.

---------------
Posted:
Topic Replies: 4, Topic Views: 447
I don't believe I would categorize a work of fiction as "Music".

---------------
Posted:
Topic Replies: 17, Topic Views: 1330
Quoting TheMadMartian:
Quote:
Quoting CubbyUps:
Quote:
What about cases where the DVD of the film has all the extras and the bluray is barebones?

I treat it the same way I do sets where the film is on one disc and all the special features are on a separate disc...list them all in the main profile and move on.  I don't need Profiler to list which disc contains the special features, just what the special features are.

Exactly.

---------------
Posted:
Topic Replies: 27, Topic Views: 1267
Quoting TheMadMartian:
Quote:
Personally, I like it just the way it is.  When I purchase a specific release, I do so based on the Blu-ray.  The DVD, much like the digital copy, is just a bonus and I do not profile it.

This is the way I view it also.

---------------
Posted:
Topic Replies: 27, Topic Views: 1267
Quoting Katatonia:
Quote:
Arrow Video do not actually distribute their "US" releases, that is handled exclusively by MVD Entertainment Group.

From my point of view, that's about as interesting as saying that UPS is the US distributor.

---------------
Posted:
Topic Replies: 7, Topic Views: 741
Quoting Merrik:
Quote:
Anyone who voted either way want to weigh in with why you feel this way?

I haven't voted, but you've already suggested a good argument for not including them:

Quoting Merrik:
Quote:
I can only speak for this specific case at the moment as even though I've seen quite a few On Set xxxxxxxx credits, since they're not tracked that way in the system (or not in the profiles at all), I wouldn't exactly know which profiles to go back into to look at those specific credits.


---------------
Posted:
Topic Replies: 32, Topic Views: 1228
Quoting mediadogg:
Quote:
I recall two old fixes to strange issues:

(1) Run as administrator

This will likely solve the problem.

---------------
Posted:
Topic Replies: 38, Topic Views: 1890
Quoting scooterberwyn:
Quote:
the rules should be followed as is. If we don't, what's the point of having them?

I'm of the opinion that The Rules were created to promote forum traffic.

---------------
Posted:
Topic Replies: 17, Topic Views: 1987
Quoting Merrik:
Quote:
Now a change is submitted to change it to something that it doesn't actually say anywhere on the film and everyone is voting yes....

It's the way they like it, and Ken doesn't care about the rules anyway.

---------------
Posted:
Topic Replies: 41, Topic Views: 1626
Quoting TheMadMartian:
Quote:
I mean, honestly, how many people really care that films produced by Twentieth Century Fox are actually released by Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation? 

About the same number who care whether a film's aspect ratio is 2.35:1 or 2.36:1, or who care to replace double spaces in overviews with single spaces.

IOW, the Contributors.

---------------
Posted:
Topic Replies: 41, Topic Views: 1626
Quoting T!M:
Quote:
I have one: just Twentieth Century Fox. As such, I can use the "Studios" tab to filter on "Twentieth Century Fox", and it shows me all my "Twentieth Century Fox" films in one fell swoop

It would be simple to settle on just one variant, but which one?  When 20th Century Pictures and Fox Film Corporation merged in 1935 to create Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation it had a hyphenated name for about 50 years, before becoming the modern Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation.  Both are valid, though the hyphenated version has seen the longest use.

Quote:
That's lovely, except that the contribution rules actually contain the exact opposite model, in which they prioritize "the name from the logo". And yet they also say not to abbreviate studio names. All in all, the rules on the subject are a mess

I agree 100%.

---------------
Posted:
Topic Replies: 41, Topic Views: 1626
Quoting AiAustria:
Quote:
I can't see, why we should use tricky excemptions, to complicate the majority of standard cases.

How did you conclude that this logo should be exempted from your "standard case"?

I would conclude just the opposite, that most logos are abbreviations of studio names and this fits right in with that model.

---------------
Posted:
Topic Replies: 41, Topic Views: 1626
Quoting Merrik:
Quote:
Quoting scotthm:
Quote:
I have quite a few films where it says "Twentieth Century-Fox presents" in the opening credits and "Released through Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation" in the closing credits.

So what studio name would YOU use in this case?

There is only one studio name, "Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation".  The opening credit uses an abbreviation of the studio name.  I would contribute "Twentieth Century-Fox Film" in order to avoid the controversy of including "Corporation".

How would you enter this studio name?

Columbia Pictures Corporation of California Ltd.

Most older Columbia films had this in the film's opening:  Columbia Pictures Corporation Presents

---------------
Posted:
Topic Replies: 41, Topic Views: 1626
Quoting AiAustria:
Quote:
Following the rules it should be sufficient to use the names from the logos.

What name should I use for this studio?



---------------
Posted:
Topic Replies: 41, Topic Views: 1626
Quoting Merrik:
Quote:
The film distinctly says twice on the credits that it's Presented/Produced/Released by Twentieth Century Fox (no Film Corporation). That's what I go with.

Fine.  Then go with that and let the votes fall where they will.

I have quite a few films where it says "Twentieth Century-Fox presents" in the opening credits and "Released through Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation" in the closing credits.

---------------
Posted:
Topic Replies: 41, Topic Views: 1626
I'm in favor.  Right now I use tags for this.

---------------
Posted:
Topic Replies: 10, Topic Views: 1487
Here is what the Rules say:
Quote:
Do not abbreviate Studio or Media Company names. e.g, use Universal Pictures not just Universal; The Criterion Collection rather than Criterion or Criterion Collection; Walt Disney Pictures not just Disney. Exception: If the studio name is too long to fit, use standard abbreviation rules.

Omit company suffixes such as LLC, Ltd., Inc.

I can see why you might want to exclude "Corporation", but given this rule, why do you believe the word "Film" should be excluded?

---------------
Posted:
Topic Replies: 41, Topic Views: 1626
I believe I would list Universal Pictures and StudioCanal as distributors and Working Title Films as the production company, and list Great Britain as the CoO.

Per the credits you list,

Universal Pictures & StudioCanal present...

... a Working Title production

Since there are only three slots to fill there's nothing more to add.

---------------
Posted:
Topic Replies: 14, Topic Views: 1762
I would say no.  Can't you find a better rear cover image online anywhere?

---------------
Posted:
Topic Replies: 8, Topic Views: 1004
Invelos Forums->Posts by scotthm Page: 1 2 3 4  Previous   Next