Quoting EnryWiki:

Quote:
Did he get the "slip cover situation" from DVD?   

He also got "Booklet" information from his DVD for some contributions 
I suppose he has a beta next-generation DVD player with currently unknown new features 

Quoting SpaceFreakMicha:

Quote:
Quoting TomGaines:

Quote:
Wasserglas mainly "operates" in the locality Germany. So you're lucky 

Thank god, that there are so many "Uberusers" to check what he is trying to contribute... 

Yes, I remember your name from a contribution I did some days ago:

14 yes-votes, 1 no (user SpaceFreakMicha with the argument "Booklet info can't be from the
DVD... *g*").

Respect, very funny, in deed. The contribution was declined. I guess you feel proud now having
helped to avoid an accurate addition to the database.

But to say it again: such funny voters like SpaceFreakMicha are an exception! The most german locality users support the idea of an accurate database instead of sabotaging it.

Quoting Lexxx:

Quote:
The strange thing is: All your contribution notes say "All information from DVD". And we all know, that you stated in another Threat in this forum, that you do not take your data directly from DVD. The only reason, you use this phrase, is because you think, that the contribution is getting approved more easily.

Not quiet right, without a 'source' the contribution will get declined, so a source has become a must. The source serves legal issues, and helps voters to valuate the correctness.

If you as a voter know, that a contribution is correct, the source serves no further purpose (assumed the mentioned source is not explicitly forbidden by rules). It is downright paradox to votes no although knowinging that the data is correct, only because the source is not.

Only a german DVD-'Beamter' can think this way.

Quote:
By the way: It's easy to reach this 1000 mark, if you only change "Case Type" and some "Features". I haven't seen any Full Audit from you...

That's not fair, Lexxx.

I've seen things, you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. Contributions where only one single punctuation mark was changed.

If I look back at the last 200, 300 contributions from September I have added or corrected Countries of Origin, Titles, Original Titles, Editions, Regions, Audio Tracks, Audio Formats, Subtitles, Overviews AND Case Type, Features and Other Features.

I've always combined multiple changes for a DVD into one contribution.

So I do not understand what you criticise.

Quoting AESP_pres:

Quote:
Quoting Dr. Killpatient:

Quote:
You're actually going to personally review each and every one of those 1,000 contributions? 

He didn't seem to have something that I own, since I never had the opportunity to vote for something he contribute. So I won't review them, but if I see is name on a contribution I will double check the change before I make a vote.

I ask for that! But please, be constructive, senseless funny-votes are not of any help for the community.

@whispering
This is NOT about grammar mistakes or errors in contribution notes, this is about a user's credibility being non-existant because of the actions of this user and the resulting credibility of his contributions.

@Wasserglas

The problem you're facing is a substantial lack of credibilty regarding your contributions.

That is because of the statements you've made in this forum in the past, explicitly admitting that in your opinion it is sufficient to LIE about the source of data as long as you know / believe it to be correct.

While your contributions may be absolutely correct, the source you provide is not. In this thread you again admit to regarding sources as irrelevant except for the purpose to get a contribution approved.

A lot of the data you submit is correct, I'll give you that, but in your case, I can't believe a single word you write in your notes because you admitted to lying in your notes. That creates a lot of extra work on the part of those casting votes, as your notes and your character can't be trusted and your data absolutely has to be crosschecked. There are a lot of users I know to work correctly and to their best knowledge, you are not one of them.

This is probably not what you intended to achieve with your posts originally, but that's the situation you're in right now. Maybe you should try to rebuild your reputation and trustworthiness amongst your peers first before attempting your 1000 contributions per month run...

Quoting Kulju:

Quote:
Quoting Wasserglas:

Quote:
If I look back at the last 200, 300 contributions from September I have added or corrected Countries of Origin, Titles, Original Titles, Editions, Regions, Audio Tracks, Audio Formats, Subtitles, Overviews AND Case Type, Features and Other Features.

What am I missing here? You talk about 200-300 LAST contributions and in opening post near thousand contributions, still you have only 153 accepted contributions??

Apparently lies about where he get the information he's supplying as well from what I've read here.

Steve

Wasserglas:

I still don't get what is your point. Why do you write "all data from DVD" if you are only contributing the "slip cover situation"?

Quoting EnryWiki:

Quote:
Wasserglas:

I still don't get what is your point. Why do you write "all data from DVD" if you are only contributing the "slip cover situation"?

Because he realized he has to provide an acceptable source, even though he obviously doesn't use it to obtain the data he submits, to get the contribution through.