How is that possible? Contributing a profile to the online concerns everybody. It changes the data used in future. Doing your own business is done localy. The moment it is contributed it is everybodys business hence the voting system. Sorry Martin I don't agree on this.

True enough, martin, but we also have Rules and they apply to ALL. When someone decides that they can stray from the Rules for what THEY want to have, they affect every other user in the world. WE simply do not at this time with ADDITIONAL anything, not just composer.We did not provide for it. And it most certainly our responsibility, in my view, that is one of the reasons I am so solid about the Rules, what id o affects YOU and vice versa and when what you are doing has an impact on me, as it does if you stray from the rules then I tend to get real annoyed real fast.

Skip

North:

I think LOTR is not a problem, I doubt that MAJOR productions would be...but maybe. On occassions where I do something of this nature I ALWAYS do due dilligence totry and sort it out and also add to my notes that IF there is any difference in what their credits might show versus what I contribute to PLEASE let me know.

However, in this particular instance re: martin, data is being corrected to remove data which should never have been inserted to begin with, as I said we do not do ADDITIONAL anything, and that is not dependent on language, we simply don't do it.

Skip

Martin:

Find anywhere iin the Rules OR the job listings that we use that says Additional ANYTHING, you won't find it. Because we don't use it. If yu want it locally I won't tell you no, you know that, but for it to be Online was illegal data PERIOD. Rationalize it anyway you wish, the data has to be removed until such time as Ken says otherwise and the results of theis poll do not support your position either. You were incorrect to put that data in there to begin with, martin, sorry.

Skip

That is a BS rationalization, martin, sorry. Its not listed we don't use it. Don't try and create your own Rules. We don't list ADR Editors and we don't exclude them either, by your arguymenmt they could be incliuded...give me a break.

Here's what I see you doing, Martin. You inserted illegal data into the database and it got caught and is being corrected. Had you not made such a big fuss over it, no foul, but you have been caught and you don't like it and you are spinning like a top totry and rationalize it. Keep it locally, Martin, I can fully appreciate that you consider it important, but locally is where it belongs...at least for now. Perhaps someday it will be different but not now.

Skip

Quoting skipnet50:

Quote:
That is a BS rationalization

Whatever. You think I'm trying to create my own rules but I'm not, I'm just reading between the lines and thinking outside the box to enhance the database and I personally think this is much better than to remove all sorts of things because of consistency or lack of support.

Quoting skipnet50:

Quote:
I appreciate that YOU want the data and that YOU consider it important and perhhaps someday we will allow it, but we don't right now. Accept it.

I am willing to accept the fact that others who own the same release as I do, don't want the information I think is important, but not from someone who thinks he speaks for all of us.

Nor am I willing to sit back and watch you manipulate the Rules and then spin and twist to rationalize it. You were wrong and you got caught at it. Now the data needs to be removed from the Online PER the Rules, Martin.

I am sorry but that's the wy it is and i am disappointed that you think reading between the lines and thinking outside the box in a blatant attempt to manipulate the online database is a good thing to do. And worse that you don't recognize the damage that could do overall to the database. All that is imporatnt is what YOU want to do.   and you will say anything no matter how irrational it may be to support it.

Skip