Quoting nimrod85:

Quote:



what was wrong with this contr. ?

" removed the white field from the backsite "

Declined with no reason 

glancing at  the scan it doesn't resemble a regular  'rectanglular'  dvd case as  it looks too tall and too narrow for an actual true scan ..

You could add a link to your post with the pic to the contribution notes:
http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=244711&PageNum=5&messageID=1386536#M1386536

From the screenshot you made I could understand why the screeners didn't see a difference. 

If a film is individually packaged, use the cover images from that packaging.
But these DVDs are not individually packaged

http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/4369/45216466.png
http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/6166/58549786.png
(left new, right old)

And the noVoters said:
"I know this is more conform to the rules but imo it was OK for all that time and it fits nicely into the collection...so why change it"
http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/5039/unbenanntrzi.png

But why do the screeners ignore this rule ? Can I contr. changes like this too, because the screeners dont care about the rules anymore ? 

Quoting nimrod85:

Quote:
But why do the screeners ignore this rule ? Can I contr. changes like this too, because the screeners dont care about the rules anymore ? 

They may be ignoring the fact that what is up now breaks the rules... but they are saying no to something else that breaks the rules. I would say they were right since your contribution breaks the rules.

Apologize for the misunderstanding.

How did you put it in your notes?

Did you stress in your notes that this is the actual cover per the Rules?

It makes it harder when people are willing to vote against the rules even like that. With an even 2 for 2 against vote like that I am surprised they didn't go through... especially since the back cover isn't even a cover at all.

I would resubmit it... stressing that the current isn't per Rules... and that the rear image isn't even of the cover at all.

Quoting nimrod85:

Quote:
But why do the screeners ignore this rule ? Can I contr. changes like this too, because the screeners dont care about the rules anymore ? 

The screeners should not ignore the rules.  As Pete said, I would resubmit with a better explanation.  Something like...

"Submitting scans of actual case.  Per the rules, "Images must be of the front and back only."  Existing scans are of an insert and a disc, so are not allowed."

If, after that, they are declined again, I would open a support ticket.

Nope... that is not per Rules. When you have all discs in a single case such as a digipack you use the case from the parent profile for all the child profiles per Rules..